Published June 9, 2010
It seems as though Google Android is starting to gain momentum. With Android only just starting to take shape here one can only assume Australia will follow the U.S. in the near future.
Google’s Android operating system edged out Apple’s iPhone operating system for the No. 2 spot in the U.S. consumer smartphone market in the first quarter, research firm NPD Group reported Monday.
According to NPD, devices running Android accounted for 28 percent of the units sold to U.S. consumers in the first quarter of 2010. BlackBerry devices made by Research In Motion, which use RIM’s homegrown operating system, took the top spot with 36 percent of the U.S. market. Apple’s iPhone, which had been in the No. 2 spot previously, fell to third place with 21 percent of the market.
Published June 7, 2010
Here is an estimate I sent to one of my blog readers today detailing the number of iPhones there are in Australia. It’s a quick and dirty estimate based on publicly available reports. It’s shot straight from the hip with no validation or cross checking. I realise there are flaws but the number feels kinda right. A good starting point is what it is.
From publicly available reports like this one you can workout that there are around 1.4 million iPhones in use in Australia. I’ve based this on there being around 100% mobile penetration in Australia. That is, around 21 million mobiles. From there 21 million x 23% (approx. size of smartphone market) x 28% (iphone share of smartphone market).
This is a rough approximation that is close to the mark when compared to not so public figures.
The 1.4 million is growing quite quickly in Australia. I can’t remember the link for the report off the top of my head.
I’ve just put a new post up on my CleanTech Australia Blog:
Corporate owners of commercial office buildings with a Net Lettable Area over 2000m2 (or parts of those buildings that meet the 2000m2 threshold) will be required to disclose the energy efficiency of those buildings when they are sold or leased under proposed new Commonwealth legislation anticipated to take effect from mid 2010.
Read the rest of the article.
The Vodafone Hutchison merger means that 3 customers can finally get iPhones.
“It’s very exciting to be introducing it to 3 customers for the first time,” VHA’s chief Nigel Dews said in a statement.
You caan read more about it here.
Published May 20, 2009
Interesting article on your goals and making your goals public, finishes with:
… those law students who had publicly announced their plan to read law journals and so forth tended to pick the larger pictures of their legal role models. That is, simply stating a strategy for becoming a good lawyer made them feel like they were real lawyers, and this inflated self-image paradoxically made them less hard working. They had become legends in their own minds, and legends don’t have to get down and dirty.
Published May 19, 2009
You aren’t allowed to create AdWords with the text “iPhone” in them – very frustrating when you’re trying to advertise a service for the iPhone.
Some cheeky buggers have managed to get around that – I wonder how long it will last:
The image is a bit dodgy, but if you look closely see that they’ve changed “iPhone” to “1Phone”.
Published April 8, 2009
What is better than smashing things?
Smash Shack is just a fantastic idea, I wish there was one nearby because I would sign up straight away. This business also has that X factor that makes you want to tell people about it.
Published April 7, 2009
I hate the word compromise.
Compromising brings up pictures of not chasing what you want from life or settling for something that isn’t completely what you’re after. When ever I’ve compromised on something in the past it has always come with unhappiness and resentment. Those that are uncompromising seem happier and are achieving what they are after.
Maybe it is the idealist in me, but isn’t an agreement reached between two people without compromise the best possible agreement they could reach? And if they need to compromise, why don’t they both find others that they can agree with, without compromise?
There are going to be times when compromise is necessary, but why not search for solution without compromise first?
The most persuasive people I know, not necessarily from a business context, all begin any request they make of you with the “why” – the vision.
I’m much more likely to respond positively to “I need to go pick up some groceries, can I please borrow your car?” then “can I please borrow your car?”
All because I know the why. Maybe it’s just me or maybe it’s people in general.